Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Beatty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 13882Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

The action was for slander, brought by plaintiff in error against defendant in error, to recover damages. Plaintiff alleged that defendant, at a public sale in the neighborhood of Jones, in Oklahoma county, and in the presence of about 200 people, slandered him- by calling him a thief, and charging him with stealing cotton and cattle from him, and to his damage in the sum of $10,000. That the charges were false and made for the purpose of damaging and injuring the plaintiff, and the defendant should pay vindictive damages in the sum of $5,000.

The defendant answered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MashoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Mathews v. CifersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API