Legal Opinion

GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. County of Alameda

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1994No. A058480PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PHELAN, J.

— Plaintiff, GTE Sprint Communications Corporation (Sprint), appeals from a judgment denying its complaint for property tax refunds (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 5148) 1 for the years 1983 and 1984. In its complaint, as it did in its petitions for reassessment to the State Board of Equalization (the Board) below, Sprint contends that the Board’s appraisers unlawfully included the value of its nontaxable intangible assets in the unit appraisal of its California property. 2 The Board responds that it was not directly taxing these intangible assets, but instead it was taxing the value of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. ITT World Communications, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Elk Hills Power v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Airtouch Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. RT Communications, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Am. Sheds, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. SHC Half Moon Bay, LLC v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API