Legal Opinion

Woodman v. Stahl

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1928No. 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULL TEXT.

RICHARDS, J.

Charles H. Stahl was the plaintiff in the Court of Common Pleas in an action to recover damages for personal injuries and the trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in his favor for $500.00.

It is urged that the judgment should be reversed for numerous errors claimed to have been committed at the trial, among which, are the claim that the petition fails to state a cause of action and that the plainiff in the trial court assumed the risk. The petition avers in substance that the plaintiff was employed by Albert B. Woodman to care for his peach orchard on Catawba Island,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Youngstown & Suburban Ry. Co. v. FaulkOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller Agency Co. v. GreeneOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Toledo v. CreightonOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. DolbeerOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API