Toledo v. Creighton
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By THE COURT
The facts in this case show that as the plaintiff below, Alice C. C'reight.on, was proceeding along a sidewalk, in the daytime, she slipped upon ice which had formed thereon. ' The law which governs is found in the following cases:
Shaefler v Sandusky, 33 Oh St, 246;
Chase v Cleveland, 44 Oh St, 505;
Conneaut v Neaf, 54 Oh St, 529.
The' plaintiff in-error raises, the . question that the court below should have directed a verdict for the defendant, the City of Toledo. An examination of the record, however, discloses that although a motion for a directed verdict was made at the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Woodman v. StahlOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Neiswender v. EdingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1978