Legal Opinion

Toledo v. Creighton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1934No. 2967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT

The facts in this case show that as the plaintiff below, Alice C. C'reight.on, was proceeding along a sidewalk, in the daytime, she slipped upon ice which had formed thereon. ' The law which governs is found in the following cases:

Shaefler v Sandusky, 33 Oh St, 246;

Chase v Cleveland, 44 Oh St, 505;

Conneaut v Neaf, 54 Oh St, 529.

The' plaintiff in-error raises, the . question that the court below should have directed a verdict for the defendant, the City of Toledo. An examination of the record, however, discloses that although a motion for a directed verdict was made at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woodman v. StahlOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neiswender v. EdingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API