Ex Parte South
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Although the complaint refers to the instrument sued on as a promissory note, and the instrument itself refers to the money agreed to be paid as a donation, it is clear from its terms that it is simply a subscription to procure the construction of a designated public road — a "state highway road leading from Fayette to Bluff to Guin, Ala." Being payable conditionally upon the completion of such a highway, it is not technically a promissory note (Louisville Banking Co. v. Gray, 123 Ala. 254,26 So. 205, 82 Am. St. Rep. 120); and, while there may have been a technical variance between the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brokaw v. McElroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Merchants Building Improvement Co. v. Chicago Exchange Building Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Trustees of Methodist Episcopal Church v. GarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Owenby v. Georgia Baptist AssemblySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Cairns v. DanielAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winslett v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Stephenson Brick Co. v. Bessemer Engineering Const.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Blount County Bank v. Robinett McCayAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Rouff v. Washington & Lee UniversityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Kilgore v. ArantAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.