Legal Opinion

Ex Parte South

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 11, 1920No. 6 Div. 100PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although the complaint refers to the instrument sued on as a promissory note, and the instrument itself refers to the money agreed to be paid as a donation, it is clear from its terms that it is simply a subscription to procure the construction of a designated public road — a "state highway road leading from Fayette to Bluff to Guin, Ala." Being payable conditionally upon the completion of such a highway, it is not technically a promissory note (Louisville Banking Co. v. Gray, 123 Ala. 254,26 So. 205, 82 Am. St. Rep. 120); and, while there may have been a technical variance between the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brokaw v. McElroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Merchants Building Improvement Co. v. Chicago Exchange Building Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Trustees of Methodist Episcopal Church v. GarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Owenby v. Georgia Baptist AssemblySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Cairns v. DanielAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winslett v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Stephenson Brick Co. v. Bessemer Engineering Const.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Blount County Bank v. Robinett McCayAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Rouff v. Washington & Lee UniversityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Kilgore v. ArantAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API