Legal Opinion

In re Mark Jankowski

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 14, 2016No. 2015-194PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Petitioner appeals from a denial of his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). We hold that petitioner is entitled to PCR to overturn his probation revocation. We remand for a new determination regarding whether his probation should be revoked and a new sentencing hearing if it is revoked.

¶ 2. In November 2010, petitioner pled guilty to sexual assault on a child, and was sentenced to a term of five to twenty years, all suspended except for three years to serve, and probation. He was charged with violation of probation (VOP) in August 2011. A VOP merits hearing was held in December…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Ernest PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. Immich v. DocVermont Superior Court · 2026
  3. In re Mark JankowskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Smedy v. DocVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API