In re Mark Jankowski
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Petitioner appeals from a denial of his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). We hold that petitioner is entitled to PCR to overturn his probation revocation. We remand for a new determination regarding whether his probation should be revoked and a new sentencing hearing if it is revoked.
¶ 2. In November 2010, petitioner pled guilty to sexual assault on a child, and was sentenced to a term of five to twenty years, all suspended except for three years to serve, and probation. He was charged with violation of probation (VOP) in August 2011. A VOP merits hearing was held in December…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Ernest PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Immich v. DocVermont Superior Court · 2026
- In re Mark JankowskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Smedy v. DocVermont Superior Court · 2024