Hunter v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The appellant, James Hunter, was tried by jury and convicted of kidnapping, theft, theft by receiving, two counts of rape, and two counts of burglary. He argues the in-court identification of him by two victims should have been suppressed because the witnesses had identified him prior to the trial in a “show up” situation which was impermissibly suggestive. While we find no merit in that argument, we must reverse and remand for a new trial in response to his other contention that the Trial Court’s refusal to grant a continuance due to the prosecutor’s failure to comply…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prater v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Chism v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Van Pelt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- McNeese v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Muñoz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- D.F. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.