Legal Opinion

San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. T.C. (In re A.F.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 29, 2017No. D072226PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBenke, Acting P. J.

*835T.C. appeals the juvenile court's dispositional order placing her minor daughter, A.F., in the care of her paternal grandmother, Donna F. T.C. contends the court erred by failing to comply with the placement preferences required under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. ) and asserts that the juvenile court should have continued A.F.'s placement with T.C.'s maternal cousin. We agree with the Agency that the juvenile court's dispositional order complied with the applicable placement preferences and affirm the order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

At the time of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Nipper v. California Automobile Assigned Risk PlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Professional Engineers in California Government v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency v. Brooke H.California Court of Appeal · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Sally H. (In re E.H.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API