Legal Opinion

United States v. Nilson Valencia-Riascos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2012No. 11-30307PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Nilson Herney Valeneia-Riascos appeals the district court’s denial of his requests to limit the courtroom presence of a law enforcement officer who was the prosecution’s main witness. Defendant argues that the district court abused its discretion and denied him due process by declining to exclude the officer from the courtroom, by allowing the officer to sit at the prosecution’s table, and by declining to require the officer to testify first.

We affirm. Federal Rule of Evidence 615 requires a district court to permit a designated officer to be present…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold GrutchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. CasasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. MachorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Marina Milicevic, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Fletcher Jones Imports, Ltd. Mercedes-Benz Usa, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. State v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. United States v. Joseph SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
  4. Bradshaw v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API