Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS UNDER RULE 69(b) (1) AND (2) FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
NICHOLS, Judge.
This case is before us on defendant’s motion under Rule 69(b) (1) and (2) for relief from our judgment in Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. United States, 388 F.2d 317, 181 Ct.Cl. 902 (1967), and defendant’s motion for a stay of proceedings on the Rule 69(b) motion until a decision has been rendered in another case pending before us. Plaintiff, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (hereinafter Kaiser), opposes both motions. A brief review of this earlier Kaiser case (hereinafter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
3Cited by15 opinions
- Toney Gomes, Jr. v. Ellen L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Torockio v. Chamberlain Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Solitron Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Reynolds Metals Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.