Legal Opinion

Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 11, 1969No. 49-63PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS UNDER RULE 69(b) (1) AND (2) FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

NICHOLS, Judge.

This case is before us on defendant’s motion under Rule 69(b) (1) and (2) for relief from our judgment in Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. United States, 388 F.2d 317, 181 Ct.Cl. 902 (1967), and defendant’s motion for a stay of proceedings on the Rule 69(b) motion until a decision has been rendered in another case pending before us. Plaintiff, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (hereinafter Kaiser), opposes both motions. A brief review of this earlier Kaiser case (hereinafter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Toney Gomes, Jr. v. Ellen L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Torockio v. Chamberlain Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Solitron Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Reynolds Metals Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  5. Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API