Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Roald A. Hogenson with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on November 21, 1966. Plaintiff filed exceptions to the commissioner’s findings and the defendant filed exceptions to the commissioner’s findings and recommended conclusion of law. The case has been submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel and the briefs of the parties.
The defendant now stresses one argument with which the commissioner did not treat, i. e., that plaintiff…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Alpert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- B-W Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Bovard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- National By-Products, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- H & M Moving, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- S.E.R., Jobs for Progress, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.