Legal Opinion
United States v. Valentino Nucci
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 14, 2004No. 02-1515PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge.
In this case, we are required to resolve two questions in the context of the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663A and 3664:(1) whether the district court plainly erred when it established an ambiguous schedule for restitution payments; and (2) whether orders for restitution by co-defendants, each for the full amount of a victim’s loss, permit a victim to recover more than the full amount of his loss. We answer the first question in the affirmative and the second, an issue of first impression in this circuit, in the negative.
BACK…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Alan N. ScottCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Frederick C. KepplerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. AhidleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Restivo v. HessemannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Francis BoccagnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. AmatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.