Legal Opinion

Hernández Nieves v. Rosario

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided June 14, 1946No. 9257Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

ON RECONSIDERATION

2Opinion of the Court · SnyderJustice Snyder

' This is a damage suit for injuries suffered by the wife of the plaintiff in 1941 while traveling as a passenger in a public automobile, P. A. 85, which was covered by an insurance policy issued pursuant to Act No. 33, Laws of Puerto Rico, 1941 (p. 548). The policy provided that it will not cover any accident which occurs while the automobile is driven by any person other than the owner. There is no dispute that at *283the time of this accident the automobile was being driven by a person other than the owner. The district court granted the motion of the defendant insurance…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Guzenfield v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Kruger v. California Highway Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ott v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Foster v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API