Legal Opinion

People v. Heath

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: At a Wade hearing prior to defendant’s first trial, a prosecution witness testified that she was shown photographs but failed to identify defendant from those photographs. Defendant’s conviction was reversed (People v Heath, 175 AD2d 562). At the retrial, on cross-examination, that witness testified that she had identified defendant from photographs. When pressed by defense counsel, however, she equivocated and indicated that she believed that she had identified defendant from photographs. On appeal, defendant argues that the People violated CPL…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. TrammelNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. HeathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. GholstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. SepulvedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API