Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Hickenlooper

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 3, 2016No. 12-1445PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

We are asked to take a second look at this case to consider the effect of the Supreme Court’s intervening opinion in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015) (hereinafter “Arizona”). See Hickenlooper v. Kerr, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2927, 192 L.Ed.2d 956 (2015). In Arizona, the Supreme Court held that the Arizona Legislature as an institution had standing to challenge a voter-approved proposition. 135 S.Ct. at 2659. For standing purposes, the Arizona Court distinguished individual legislators,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Collins v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. State of Tenn. v. United States Dep't of StateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Gene Yaw v. Delaware River Basin CommissioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. Kerr v. PolisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API