Legal Opinion
Redall Industries, Inc. v. Wiegand
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 16, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-73235PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Trustees of the Redall Industries Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan (“Trustees”) and plaintiff Redall Industries, Inc. (“Redall”) filed this action against defendant Lawrence J. Wiegand under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. In Count I of the first amended complaint, plaintiff Trustees seek restitution of $427,281 which the Redall Industries Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan (“Redall Plan”) overpaid to Wiegand as part of his pension benefits. Wiegand filed a counterclaim…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Butler v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Plastic Engineered Components, Inc. v. Titan Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997