Legal Opinion
Parsons v. Pond
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 24, 2000No. Civ.A. 3:97CV2665JCHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 26]
HALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas C. Parsons brings this action for money damages against the defendants, David W. Pond, Paul M. Visokay, and Maria Rodriguez McBride, alleging various violations of his constitutional rights as well as several state law claims. The defendants, who are federal probation officers, move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) for summary judgment in their favor on Parsons’s complaint on the ground of qualified immunity. For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 26]…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Hart v. Town of GuilderlandDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Hart v. Town of GuilderlandDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Pastrana v. New York City Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Stephen Williams v. Federal Aviation Administration, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.