Schmalle v. Schmalle

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] In these post-judgment divorce proceedings, Elmer Sehmalle appeals from a second and a third amended judgment, and Bettianne Sehmalle cross-appeals from the third amended judgment. We reverse the trial court’s modification of spousal support, affirm the court’s clarification of Bettianne Sehmalle’s interest in Elmer Schmalle’s military retirement benefits, affirm the court’s decision Bettianne Schmalle’s bankruptcy rendered inoperable a provision for indemnification of credit card debt assigned to her in the initial decree, and we remand with directions.

I

[¶ 2] Elmer…