Smith v. Paul.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by Lola I. Smith against J. A. Paul, heard by Judge Prederich Moore and a jury, at December Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of Beaueokt County. Erom a judgment for the defendants the plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtWalKek, J.
This is an action for the recovery of real property. In order to determine the conflicting claims of the parties, the Court prepared and submitted the issues set forth in the record. It is unnecessary that we should examine and pass upon the numerous exceptions of the plaintiffs, as we think that one of their exceptions was well taken, and the ruling of the Court to which this exception was taken entitles them to a new trial. The other questions may not again be presented for decision.
The jury returned a verdict- upon the issues which the plaintiffs contended was complete and sufficient to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- State v. . TooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- James v. State ex rel. DossMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
- Norvell v. DevalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. InglandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Sitterson v. . SittersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. GatlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- American Craft Hosiery Corp. v. Damascus Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1983
- In Re SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.