Bechtel v. . Bohannon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.
After answer filed, setting up defenses to plaintiff’s re- * covery in tbis action on tbe merits, defendants demurred ore tenus to tbe complaint, for tbat tbe facts stated therein are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Upon tbe bearing, tbe demurrer was sustained. O. S., 518. From judgment dismissing tbe action, plaintiff appealed to tbis Court. If upon tbe facts alleged in tbe complaint, plaintiff is entitled, as a matter of law, to any relief, tbe judgment must be reversed. S. v. Trust Co., 192 N. C., 246, 134 S. E., 656.
Plaintiff bas failed to state in ber complaint facts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Plotkin v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Corley Co. v. . GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Scott v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Tripp v. . LangstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- In re HaithcockDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.