Legal Opinion · Dissent

McIsaac v. Monte Carlo Club, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 20, 1991No. 1900714Published

1Dissent

I agree with the majority in its affirmance of the summary judgment against Sheila McIsaac's claim, but I dissent from the majority's reversal as to John Paul Howard's claim.

I agree with Judge Robert G. Kendall, the trial judge, that the doctrine of complicity is a judicially created exception to liability under the Dram Shop Act and that it should be adopted in Alabama. The doctrine of complicity is also referred to as the "non-innocent party doctrine" in Craig v. Larson, 432 Mich. 346, 439 N.W.2d 899 (1989). We have applied this doctrine, without naming it, by holding that "the intoxicated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Maples v. Chinese Palace, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Ward v. Rhodes, Hammonds, and Beck, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Parker v. Miller Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. James v. Brewton Motel Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API