McIsaac v. Monte Carlo Club, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I agree with the majority in its affirmance of the summary judgment against Sheila McIsaac's claim, but I dissent from the majority's reversal as to John Paul Howard's claim.
I agree with Judge Robert G. Kendall, the trial judge, that the doctrine of complicity is a judicially created exception to liability under the Dram Shop Act and that it should be adopted in Alabama. The doctrine of complicity is also referred to as the "non-innocent party doctrine" in Craig v. Larson, 432 Mich. 346, 439 N.W.2d 899 (1989). We have applied this doctrine, without naming it, by holding that "the intoxicated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Maples v. Chinese Palace, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Ward v. Rhodes, Hammonds, and Beck, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Parker v. Miller Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- James v. Brewton Motel Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.