Atlanta Brewing & Ice Co. v. Bluthenthal & Bickart
Supreme Court of Georgia
Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton county. ■ February 1, 1897.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.
1. The petition for injunction and receiver in this case was against “M. Teitlebaum, agent for Mrs. M. Teitlebaum,” the latter being the former’s wife. An amendment was allowed, striking from the petition the words, “agent for Mrs. M. Teitlebaum”; to which ruling the defendants excepted. In McDuffie v. Irvine, 91 Ga. 748, it was held : “A declaration in the name of E. D. Irvine, agent for the Georgia Music House, is amendable by striking out the descriptive terms following the plaintiff’s name.” We are aware of no good reason why this rule in reference to amendments should not be as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dinkler v. Potts & PottsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- McDuffie v. IrvineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Barnwell v. WoffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Exchange Bank v. H. B. Claflin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Collins v. Myers & MarcusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- State v. SalladeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Georgia Power & Light Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Irvine's Georgia Music House v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe FactorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.