Legal Opinion

Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 25, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Sweat. Glynn county. December 14, 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

1. When it is affirmatively shown by direct and positive evidence that mortgages attacked as fraudulent are bona fide because given to secure debts actually due by the mortgagor, and there is no evidence to the contrary, they should be treated as valid subsisting liens upon the property which they cover.

2. The present case, upon its undisputed facts, is controlled by the decision of this court in Atlanta B. & I. Co. v. Bluthenthal, 101 Ga. 541, and the cases there cited.

3. The court erred in granting an injunction and appointing a receiver.

Judgment reversed.

All concurring, except Cobb, J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlanta Brewing & Ice Co. v. Bluthenthal & BickartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Savannah Shoe Factory v. Kaiser & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API