Legal Opinion

McClenachan v. Malis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1932No. Appeal, 256PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This is a suit by a vendor against his vendees for the purchase price of real estate in the City of Chester, less $3,000 paid on account. The plaintiff has judgment. Defendants have appealed. Though in form assumpsit, in fact the vendor seeks specific performance, asking payment of the agreed consideration in exchange for his deed. By their agreement, the equitable estate in the land passed to defendants, plaintiff holding the legal title for them, the equitable property in the consideration passing to plaintiff; the suit, therefore, is governed by well-settled…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ray's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Irvin v. BleakleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  3. Salter v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  4. Ingersoll v. SergeantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  5. Swieczkowski v. Sypniewski, Exr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Delco Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Heights Land Co. v. Swengel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Harris v. DawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Coral Gables, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API