Legal Opinion

Fair v. Morrow

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1935No. 4072PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

This is an appeal from that part of a judgment in a forcible entry and detainer action awarding damages for detention of real estate. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were made by the court or requested by either party.

1. Appellants’ first point is to the effect that the district court erred in hearing the cause without notice being given to appellants (defendants below). The judgment recites, “And the defendants appearing by their attorney, John E. Hall,” from which it would seem they were represented at the hearing irrespective of notice. The transcript of evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mann v. WhitelyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Alexander Hamilton Institute v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Harris & Maldonado v. SperryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Arias v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wells Fargo Bank v. DaxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wells Fargo Bank v. DaxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API