Knipmeyer v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPPARD JR., /.,
This is a class action against Bell Atlantic Corporation and its local operating companies. The plaintiffs, Kevin and Joanne Knipmeyer, claim that the phone companies misrepresented the meaning of the term “nonpublished telephone number.” At issue are the defendants’ preliminary objections. Because the “filed rate doctrine” bars the Knipmeyers’ claims, the court sustains the objections and dismisses the complaint.
FACTS
The defendants — collectively, “Bell Atlantic” — are Bell Atlantic Corporation and its nine local operating companies: Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Bell…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Wegoland Ltd. v. NYNEX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Taffet v. Southern Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Marcus v. AT & T CORP.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weinberg v. Sprint Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Weinberg v. Sprint Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002