Eldridge v. Sherman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Yan Burén. (Mills, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
On March 9, 1886, defendant, Sherman, gave his promissory note to one F. VV. Seilick for the sum of $70, and, to secure the payment thereof, made, executed, and delivered to Seilick a chattel mortgage upon one black mare, 12 years old, and one yearling sorrel colt.
On March 15, 1886, defendant also gave to one A. D. Hop-pin his note for $500, to secure the payment of which he gave Hoppin a chattel mortgage for said amount on five horses and other property.' These horses included those .mentioned in the Seilick mortgage, and this mortgage was given subject to the Seilick mortgage. Both…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burt v. BurtMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Hunt v. StrewMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Hess v. GriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoppin v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Ecker v. LindskogSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Eldredge v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1890