Legal Opinion

Burt v. Burt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Macomb. Eeplevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is an action of replevin for a span of colts, a wagon and a harness. The defendant is the son of the plaintiff, and the suit had its origin in a family difficulty.

The plaintiff’s version of the facts, so far as they seem material in making out his case, is as follows: Plaintiff was married in 1841 to a Miss Prosser in the State of New York, and settled with her upon an eighty acre lot in Macomb county in this State, where the wife still resides. In 1859 he and his wife had a difficulty, and a separation was agreed upon. At that time he owned two eighty-acre lots, and it was agreed that…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Schrandt v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McCarty v. KepretaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. FerrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Adams v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API