Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Sanner

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1939No. Civil No. 4109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— Warren Sanner, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to recover certain wages which he alleged were due him for the time he had been illegally discharged from the position of inspector in the street railway department of the city.

The allegations set up by the complaint were, in substance, that plaintiff at all times mentioned in his complaint was a duly certified railway inspector under the civil service rules of the City of Phoenix, and that notwithstanding his record entitled him to perform the duties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. YoungsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Paddock v. BrisboisArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Ex parte BeckDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1917
  4. Reading v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Thompson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Utah Oil Refining Co. v. HendrixIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Sato v. First National Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. City of Phoenix v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  5. McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API