Legal Opinion
Rivera v. Santiago
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 30, 1985No. 3070PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStodolink, J.
The plaintiff brought an action pursuant to General Statutes § 42a-14h,1 which provides judicial relief for tenants who claim that their landlords *609have failed to perform their legal duties as required by § 47a-7 of the General Statutes. The plaintiffs complaint was filed on January 18, 1984. On October 24, 1983, the defendant landlord had caused a notice to quit to be served on the plaintiff tenant. A summary process action was commenced on December 5, 1983, returnable on January 10, 1984.
The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction since it concluded that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Welk v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Eagle Hill Corp. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Ciavaglia v. BollesConnecticut Superior Court · 1982
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Housing Authority of East Hartford v. HirdConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Carnese v. MiddletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Bargain Mart, Inc. v. LipkisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- O'Brien Properties, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.