Legal Opinion

(HC) Hill v. Arnold

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 2, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02200Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TION ALONZO HILL, No. 2:17-cv-2200 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 ERIC ARNOLD, Warden 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an 18 application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The matter was 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 20 302. By separate order, respondent will be directed to file an answer to the petition. This order is 21…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. King v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Knowles v. MunizDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API