Heybrook v. Beard
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, W. P. Bell, J., entered January 16, 1912, dismissing an action on contract, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
This is an action upon a contract. A general demurrer was sustained to the amended complaint. Plaintiffs elected to stand upon the complaint and the action was dismissed, Plaintiffs have appealed.
The contract which forms the basis of the action was made on the 17th day of August, 1907, between the appellants as the first parties and the respondents William Brown and J. F. Beard as the second parties. The latter will be hereafter referred to as the respondents. The contract recites that the appellants, in consideration of $3,000 then paid to them by the respondents, and in consideration of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hatch v. Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- McRae v. Stillwell, Millen & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- White v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Lumber Co. v. Corey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Anderson v. Miami Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
- Layman v. LedgettWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Layman v. LedgettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Layman v. LedgettWashington Supreme Court · 1978