Legal Opinion

Layman v. Ledgett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 11, 1977No. 2071-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, C.J.

Plaintiffs and defendant each claim ownership of and the right to cut and harvest all timber on a quarter section of land in Klickitat County. Plaintiffs, George, James, and Edmond Layman, claim their right by a quitclaim deed from their father, D. M. Layman, which purported to convey all the timber in the tract “in perpetuity with necessary easements for the enjoyment of the rights hereby granted forever.” Defendant, J. L. Ledgett, claims his right by Klickitat County treasurer’s deed which purported to convey the “land only.”

In 1933, D. M. Layman purchased the southeast quarter of Section…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Wasser & Winters Co. v. Jefferson CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Franke v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Nelson v. McKinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Leuthold v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hedin v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  2. Layman v. LedgettWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Layman v. LedgettWashington Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API