Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Beider
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 30, 1994No. 1-93-4053PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rakowski
The Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers) filed a petition to reopen the estate of Harold Beider (Harold) and for leave to file a claim against the estate. Travelers contended that it was a creditor of the estate, that it did not receive timely notice of Harold’s death, and that it only became aware of Harold’s death after the estate was closed. The trial court granted Marlys Beider’s (co-executor of the estate, hereafter Marlys) section 2—619 motion to dismiss the petition. (735 ILCS 5/2—619 (West 1992).) We aflirm.
On November 14, 1984, Harold Beider signed a promissory note. Harold agreed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Estate of ItoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- In Re Estate of HoheiserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Messenger v. RutherfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Dichtl v. Foster McGaw HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Lane v. Qik N EZ Properties, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- In re: Estate of TopalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- In re Estate of TopalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022