Legal Opinion
Hoff v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 662
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 1987No. 85CA0147PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRISWELL, Judge.
Both plaintiff (the employee) and defendant, Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 662 (ATU), appeal from the judgment of the district court awarding the employee $18,000 in damages for ATU’s violation of its duty of fair representation. Because we conclude that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support the damage award, we reverse.
The employee was employed as a driver by the Pueblo Transportation Company (employer), a bus company operated by the City of Pueblo. We assume that the company is an “employer” within the meaning of the Labor Peace Act, § 8-3-101, et…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Bowen v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allen v. Dayco Products, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- Regional Transportation District v. Colorado Department of Labor & Employment, Division of LaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Mares v. Conagra Poultry Co., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Vaske v. DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- Norton v. School District No. 1, City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.