Legal Opinion
Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1983No. 81CA0446PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN CISE, Judge.
Plaintiff (buyer) instituted this action to recover amounts advanced by it and not repaid by defendants (seller) for water line construction. Judgment was entered in favor of buyer, and is not challenged on this appeal. Seller counterclaimed for the bal-*972anee due for water service provided to buyer for the period June 1973 through 1976. Seller appeals the judgment dismissing that counterclaim. We reverse.
From the inception of its stockyards business, seller has operated a cooperative water system, obtaining water from Denver through its Board of Water Commissioners, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Buckley Bros. Motors, Inc. v. Gran Prix Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Flank Oil Co. v. Tennessee Gas Transmission CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Hessey v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Boston Molasses Co. v. Molasses Distributors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Mastercar, Inc. v. Amoco Oil Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992