Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Burrows

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 4, 1970PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an action of contract to recover under an indemnity clause in a stock purchase agreement. A judge sitting without a jury made findings of fact and found for each plaintiff in the same amount. The case comes here on the defendant’s exceptions to certain rulings.

Findings of the judge include the following. On or about December 30,1959, the plaintiff Sloan entered into an agreement to purchase all the outstanding stock in Mattson & Rowse, Inc. (Mattson) from its owner Burrows, the defendant. Sloan had been employed by Mattson since 1950, first as a truck driver and, from 1957, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Swartz v. LiebermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. Boston Professional Hockey Ass'n v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Lipson v. AdelsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. New England Merchants National Bank v. Coleman R. Rosenfield, and Gladys RosenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. RossiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API