Legal Opinion
Chamberlain v. Barrows
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 10, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of contract brought in the name of the judge of probate by Grant A. Stonebury, assignee. The declaration contains two counts. The first alleges that there is a balance due Stonebury, as assignee, on two judgments entered in the Superior Court against the defendant in her capacity as executrix of the estate of Henry H. Barrows; The second count seeks to recover judgment in the penal sum of the bond filed by the defendant as executrix of that estate. At the trial before a judge of the Superior Court the defendant admitted the *297execution and filing of the bond, that the judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Guild v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Hastings v. LovejoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Landrum v. Trowbridge, Dwight & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Moskow v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Barnett v. RosenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sherman v. SidmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Sloan v. BurrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Wallin v. SmolenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Grouf v. State Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Silva & Santos, Inc. v. PreviteMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.