Johnson v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMorrill, J.
This action to recover damages for personal injuries is before the Law Court upon motion for a new trial in the usual form, and upon exceptions to rulings upon the admission of evidence. The argument upon the motion has been confined to the contention that the damages are excessive.
An examination of the record shows that the trial developed a decided difference of opinion between the expert witnesses summoned by the respective parties, as to the injuries which the plaintiff sustained. The writ alleged, and the medical testimony for the plaintiff tended to show that the plaintiff sustained a…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Beahm v. ShortallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Goldstein v. SklarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Parr v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Waldroop v. Driver-Miller Plumbing & Heating Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.