Parr v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
This appeal is determined adversely to the appellant on the following holdings. (All employment referred to herein is extrahazardous.)
When a workman is allergic to dust of various kinds and characters, such as road dust, house dust, wood dust, etc., and that allergy causes asthma, and the asthma becomes permanently disabling (in whole or in part), the fact that his employment required him to work in great quantities of wood dust for several hours at a time during certain seasons of the year, occasioning him great discomfort and causing asthmatic attacks, does not in itself establish that his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ehman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Berndt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Simpson Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Petersen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ravsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Sacred Heart Medical Center v. CarradoWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Bennett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Gorre v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Favor v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.