Legal Opinion
Rebish v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 25, 2017No. 14-1022C (Pro Se)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Keywords: Settlement Agreement; Neutral Reference Provision; Breach of Contract; Damages; Causation; Motion to Compel; Summary Judgment; .RCFC 56; Pro Se.
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Jimmi Tyler Rebish is a former employee of the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation (the Bureau). In 2008, the Bureau notified him that it intended to reassign him from its Idaho office to its Denver, Colorado office. Mr. Rebish invoked the agency’s internal grievance procedure, claiming that the reassignment was proposed in retaliation for protected activity. The grievance…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- San Antonio Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Simmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026