Legal Opinion
Moore v. Florida Bank of Commerce
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 21, 1986No. C-3-85-709PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #25); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED FOR DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
The motion of the Defendant herein, seeking an order of this Court granting summary judgment in its favor and against the Plaintiff (Doc. # 25), is sustained, and judgment for the Defendant and against the Plaintiff will be entered accordingly.
This action was brought by the Plaintiff, Marcella Moore, against the Defendant, Florida Bank of Commerce (FBC), to recover the difference between the advertised value and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Haluka v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
- United States v. Henry TarrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- UFITEC, S.A. v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Fillippo v. S. Bonaccurso & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Michael G. Schroyer Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel Gerald M. Smith Company, L.P.A., D/B/A Smith & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- York v. InTrust Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Renner v. Derin Acquisition Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ullman v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Laveck v. Al's Mustang StableOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.