Legal Opinion

State v. Garza

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1974No. 39127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

After a full evidentiary hearing, the District Court denied the defendant post conviction relief on the asserted grounds of incompetency of counsel and improper venue of the original trial. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The defendant was jury convicted and sentenced for the crime of forcible rape on a 17-year-old girl. The transcript of the record of the original trial is before us in this post conviction action. We have reviewed it. The evidence is ample to sustain the conviction. Briefly, the prosecutrix, accompanied by her boy friend’s older brother, was on her way home…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PutnamNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PhelpsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. TiffNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Garton v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1976
  4. Vincent Garza v. Warden Charles L. Wolff, Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. State v. GodekNebraska Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API