Legal Opinion

State v. Putnam

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1967No. 36588PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Defendant has appealed from a denial of post convic tion relief on an evidentiary hearing. He contends that his plea of guilty to a charge of horse stealing was involuntary and that his appointed counsel rendered ineffective assistance.

Charles F. Fisher, defense counsel, had conferred with defendant for 15 minutes prior to the arraignment on May 24, 1965. During the hearing the court asked defendant whether he understood his right to a jury trial. Defendant answered, “Yes, I guess so.” (A judgment on a burglary conviction of defendant by a jury had been reversed the preceding March. State v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. People v. TomaselliNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. State v. PutnamNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MossNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EugeneNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API