Secco v. Chicago Transit Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robson
This was an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she was caught between the doors of defendant’s moving bus. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $100. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was overruled and she appeals on the ground that the verdict was grossly inadequate.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred first in admitting in evidence an incompetent school record, and second in giving a certain instruction for the defendant. As to the first part, the record reveals that plaintiff testified that as a result of the injuries sustained she…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bell v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Gourley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- West Chicago Street Railroad v. BuckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- The PEOPLE v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Smith v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Diminskis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Benford v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Nussbaum Trucking, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.