Legal Opinion

Moore v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1928No. 6 Div. 694PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The statement of the case filed herewith is sufficient to indicate the questions presented, and to demonstrate that the appellants’ contention that complainant and those under whom he claims entered as tenants in common with John W. and Della Moore is untenable.

The principle asserted by the appellants, that when one enters upon lands he is presumed to enter under the title which, his deed purports on its face to convey, both as to the extent of the land and the nature of his interest, is unquestionably sound. Dew v. Garner, 207 Ala. 353, 92 So. 647, 27 A.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kidd v. BorumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Joyce v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Riggs v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Johnson v. ToulminSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  5. Abercrombie v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Stearnes v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. State Realty Co. v. LigonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Thompson v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Bailey v. BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API