Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Bond

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1938No. 4 Div. 51PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a suit in equity by appellant and the controversy is with Dr. L. T. Hutto, or now his legatee and executrix, he having died pending the suit.

The equity of the bill is a sale of land for division. Dr. Hutto claimed to own it in its entirety, and that question was decided in his favor by the trial court. The essential facts are without dispute.

On December 4, 1890, the land was owned by Ausborn Jones, when he and his wife, M. A. R. Jones, executed a mortgage to one A. D. Wood. On December 16, 1897, that mortgage was foreclosed and Robert Newman became the purchaser and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kidd v. BorumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Winsett v. WinsettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Oxford v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Ashford v. AshfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Riley v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Ruffin v. CrowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Ward v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Gordon v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API