Legal Opinion
Haberman v. West Saddle Dev.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 28, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 N.J. Super. 542 (1989)
566 A.2d 552
FREDRIC HABERMAN AND SHEILA HABERMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
WEST SADDLE DEVELOPMENT CORP. A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, GEORGE MCCARTHY, THORE CHRISTIANSEN, JOHN DOE AND RICHARD ROE, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted September 27, 1989.
Decided November 28, 1989.
Before Judges KING, BAIME and KEEFE.
Jaffe & Schlesinger, attorneys for appellants (Howard G. Schlesinger, of counsel; Robert K. Walsh, on the brief).
John V. McCambley, attorney for respondents, West Saddle Development Corp., George McCarthy and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. SchulmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Rzepiennik v. US Home Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Postizzi v. Leisure+ TechnologyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Nolan v. Homes by Brinkerhoff, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spolitback v. Cyr Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Oak Trail Road Homeowners Ass'n v. Royal Mile Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Central Heights Condominium Ass'n v. Little Falls Savings & Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Yaroshefsky v. ADM Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002