Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Homes by Brinkerhoff, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 28, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, P.J.Cv.

This is the return day of motions for summary judgment brought by the defendants, the builder and the administrator of a warranty insurance program for a new home. The issue raised by the motions is whether the buyer of a new home may bring suit under an alternate new home warranty security program, established pursuant to N.J.S.A. 46:3B-8, after the buyer has participated in an informal dispute settlement proceeding. Because the new home warranty given to the buyer in this case provided for non-binding informal dispute settlement and informed the buyer that he could bring…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Aetna Ins. Co. v. WeissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  3. Rzepiennik v. US Home Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Postizzi v. Leisure+ TechnologyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  2. Haberman v. West Saddle Dev.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  3. Oak Trail Road Homeowners Ass'n v. Royal Mile Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API