Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. Schulman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of -the court was delivered by
Passman, J.
The main issue in this case involves the extent to which defendants Max and Sally Schulman are entitled to reimbursement for relocation expenses incurred as a consequence of the condemnation of their business property. Also at issue is the propriety of defendants’ failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing an appeal to Superior Court. Defendants claim entitlement under the Constitution, the Relocation Assistance Act, N. J. S. A. 30 :4r-l et seq., and a consent order entered into with plaintiff Paterson Redevelopment Agency.
On…
2Cited by38 opinions
- Abbott v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Clair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Bd. of Education Bernards Tp. v. Bernards Tp. Ed. Assn.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Levine v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONS & AGENCIESSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- CITY OF ATLANTIC v. LaezzaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.