Legal Opinion

Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. Schulman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 4, 1979PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of -the court was delivered by

Passman, J.

The main issue in this case involves the extent to which defendants Max and Sally Schulman are entitled to reimbursement for relocation expenses incurred as a consequence of the condemnation of their business property. Also at issue is the propriety of defendants’ failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing an appeal to Superior Court. Defendants claim entitlement under the Constitution, the Relocation Assistance Act, N. J. S. A. 30 :4r-l et seq., and a consent order entered into with plaintiff Paterson Redevelopment Agency.

On…

2Cited by38 opinions

  1. Abbott v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Clair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Bd. of Education Bernards Tp. v. Bernards Tp. Ed. Assn.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Levine v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONS & AGENCIESSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. CITY OF ATLANTIC v. LaezzaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API